Or at least that's
what
the career academics want you to believe so that they can justify their
terrible life choices.
Three Minute Philosophy began as a animated web series that sought to
both stretch the definition of "animated" about as far as anyone's
willing to concede, and help beginners learn about philosophy and have
fun doing it.
Since the original series back in 2007 (which remains more popular on
YouTube because I swore a lot) people have actually started utilising
Three Minute Philosophy as an educational resource. Well, you chose the
damn elective so that's your perogative. I'll promise to try to be
accurate if you promise to stop asking for Ayn Rand (you won't).
Oh and hi, look at this website where I will put up the new episodes
and also write some philosophy articles for you to read and hopefully
get something useful out of. I just ended a sentence with a preposition
and I don't even care.
Sorry about that. But if it's any
consolation, it's a really complicated and unsettled debate. From
pre-Socratic times through to Aristotle and the modern era, the
question about what exactly "free will" means and what it entails has
taken up a considerable amount of time in which philosophers could be
doing something more with their lives. Covers determinism, fatalism,
libertarianism, and a bunch of stuff in between.
As bizarre as it sounds, the
popularity of zombies or vampires in fiction tends to relate directly
to who is in charge of the White House in any particular era. As one of
the few horror movie philosophers likely to exist, here's my analysis
on the situation. [Hosted by CRACKED.com]
Gottlob Frege and Saul Kripke have a
lot to say about names because theirs are particularly stupid ones.
Namely (ha!) the question dates back to Aristotle about how names
actually work. How do words relate to facts about the world? You might
be surprised to know that we are still arguing about it because the
Morning Star and the Evening Star are actually the same thing and it's
not a star at all and apparently that just messes up everything.
This essay will attempt to put this self-destructive and absurd
superstition to rest once and for all, and to demonstrate that a truly
scientific mind must eliminate these counter-intuitive contrivances if
we are to ever progress as a society. I will prove beyond a shadow of a
doubt that there is not now, nor has there ever been, a Richard Dawkins.
Why do actors get caught up in their own fictions? Why do we get
confused about what is or isn't real about movies and the actors cast
in them? What do gossip magazines have to do with all of this? Why the
hell am I writing about Twilight? Does philosophy hold the answers?
Maybe!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
S Peter Davis is an Australian based author and a freelance
editor for Cracked.com. When not writing reams of largely unpublishable
fiction, he works as a university librarian to earn the money to feed
his family (his family consists entirely of his fish, Marlin Brando).
He has been featured in the New York Times Bestselling book You Might Be a
Zombie, and likes to think he has a promising career ahead of him.
He also likes to speak of himself in the third person, as this is a
rhetorical device used to allow a person to speak of oneself without
appearing egocentric.